THE RECENT declaration by the Honourable Minister of Education, Prof. Tahir Mamman SAN, which prohibits students under the age of 18 from taking the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) and National Examinations Council (NECO) examinations, has sparked widespread concern.
For instance, many prodigies have earned their PhDs before the age of 25, having been given the opportunity to advance through their education at a pace suited to their abilities. By setting an arbitrary age limit, this new policy effectively closes the door to such possibilities for Nigerian students, forcing gifted children to conform to a timeline that may not align with their intellectual capabilities.
In Nigeria, the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) and the National Examinations Council (NECO) are the primary qualifying examinations required for students to gain admission into tertiary institutions.
WAEC is a regional examination recognised across West Africa and it serves as a standardised assessment for students in countries like Nigeria, Ghana, Sierra Leone, The Gambia, and Liberia. NECO, on the other hand, is a national examination specifically designed for Nigerian students, providing an alternative route to meeting the academic requirements for higher education within the country.
ALSO READ: Third West African Citizen’s Summit: Turning The Page On Subversion Of Democracy; By Jibrin Ibrahim
Both examinations assess students’ proficiency in key subjects such as English, Mathematics, and other relevant subjects aligned with their intended fields of study. Successful completion of either WAEC or NECO with the necessary credits in required subjects is essential for students seeking admission into universities, polytechnics, and colleges of education across Nigeria. These examinations are the foundational criteria that ensure students have acquired the necessary knowledge and skills to pursue advanced studies at the tertiary level.
This policy, aimed at ensuring that no one under 18 years gains admission into tertiary institutions, has been met with significant criticism. These criticisms are based particularly on its impact on gifted children. Such a blanket age restriction fails to consider the diverse academic abilities of students, potentially stifling the growth of young prodigies who could otherwise make remarkable contributions to academia and society.
ALSO READ: Managing The Household In A Crisis Economy; By Godwin A. Abeghe
The most glaring issue with this policy is its disregard for the needs of gifted children. Across the globe, there are numerous examples of exceptionally-talented students who have reached remarkable academic milestones at a young age.
For instance, many prodigies have earned their PhDs before the age of 25, having been given the opportunity to advance through their education at a pace suited to their abilities. By setting an arbitrary age limit, this new policy effectively closes the door to such possibilities for Nigerian students, forcing gifted children to conform to a timeline that may not align with their intellectual capabilities.
Gifted children often require a learning environment that challenges them appropriately. When such children are held back due to age restrictions, they may experience boredom, frustration, and a lack of motivation, leading to under-achievement. The new policy, rather than nurturing these young talents, risks stifling their potential by imposing a one-size-fits-all approach to education.
In this age of technology, children are increasingly exposed to vast arrays of information and learning opportunities, making them more vibrant and capable at younger ages. They often develop advanced skills in areas like coding, science, and critical thinking, well before traditional age expectations. However, imposing age limits on their educational advancement can have negative effects. It stifles their potential, forcing them to conform to outdated timelines rather than allowing them to progress according to their abilities. This not only hinders their personal growth but also deprives society of the innovations and contributions these young talents could make.
The admission of gifted children into tertiary institutions is not harmful to either the children or the country. In fact, it can be highly beneficial! Unlike unqualified students who may struggle to keep up with the academic demands of higher education, gifted children often possess the intellectual capacity, motivation, and maturity needed to excel in a challenging academic environment.
ALSO READ: Pa Imoudu And His Descendants In NLC And TUC; By Aminu Habibu Jahun
Gifted children tend to thrive when they are allowed to advance at a pace that matches their abilities, and early admission into tertiary institutions can provide them with the requisite opportunity to develop their talents fully. This not only benefits the children themselves, by allowing them to reach their potential, but also contributes to the country’s intellectual and economic growth. These young prodigies can become innovators, researchers, and leaders, who drive progress in various fields bringing significant advantages to society as a whole.
By contrast, admitting unqualified students into tertiary institutions can lead to higher dropout rates, poor academic performance, and a waste of resources. These students may struggle to meet the demands of higher education, leading to frustration and a lack of success. Therefore, the focus should be on ensuring that all students admitted to tertiary institutions are adequately prepared, regardless of age, rather than imposing age restrictions that could prevent gifted children from reaching their full potential.
In this age of technology, children are increasingly exposed to vast arrays of information and learning opportunities, making them more vibrant and capable at younger ages. They often develop advanced skills in areas like coding, science, and critical thinking, well before traditional age expectations. However, imposing age limits on their educational advancement can have negative effects. It stifles their potential, forcing them to conform to outdated timelines rather than allowing them to progress according to their abilities. This not only hinders their personal growth but also deprives society of the innovations and contributions these young talents could make.
For instance, the introduction of a tiered system, where students can take assessments to demonstrate their readiness for tertiary education regardless of age, would be a more inclusive approach. Additionally, mentorship programmes, counselling, and tailored curricula could help younger students navigate the demands of higher education without feeling overwhelmed.
The policy also places Nigeria at odds with educational practices in many other countries, where age is less of a barrier to academic advancement. In the United States, for example, students as young as 15 have been known to enrol in college with some even earning advanced degrees by their early twenties. Countries like India and China, known for producing a large number of young engineers, doctors, and scientists, do not impose such age restrictions. These nations recognise that educational advancement should be based on ability rather than age.
By preventing young Nigerians from progressing at their own pace, the country risks falling behind on the global stage. As the world becomes increasingly competitive, nations that fail to nurture their brightest minds from a young age will find themselves at a disadvantage.
While it is important to ensure that students entering tertiary institutions are matured enough to handle the challenges of higher education, this should not come at the cost of stifling the development of exceptional talents. A more balanced approach would involve creating alternative pathways for gifted students, allowing them to advance according to their abilities while also providing the necessary support to ensure their social and emotional well-being.
For instance, the introduction of a tiered system, where students can take assessments to demonstrate their readiness for tertiary education regardless of age, would be a more inclusive approach. Additionally, mentorship programmes, counselling, and tailored curricula could help younger students navigate the demands of higher education without feeling overwhelmed.
The new age restriction on JAMB and NECO examinations, while likely well-intentioned, represents a step backward in Nigeria’s educational policy. By imposing a rigid age requirement, the policy overlooks the needs of gifted children, potentially hindering the country’s ability to cultivate its brightest minds.
To remain competitive on the global stage and to truly unlock the potential of all its students, Nigeria must adopt a more flexible and inclusive approach to education, one that recognises and nurtures talent at every age.
Prince Peters A. Adeyemi JP, is the General Secretary, Non-Academic Staff Union of Educational and Associated Institutions (NASU) and Vice-President, Public Services International (Global).
