BY IVO TAKOR
THE NATIONAL Pension Commission’s (PenCom) announcement that retirement benefit applications can now be approved within 48 hours is a welcome development in the administration of Nigeria’s Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS). At the Commission’s 2026 media engagements, Director-General Ms Omolola Oloworaran described the timeline as a mandatory service standard for Pension Fund Administrators (PFAs), alongside progress in settling pension liabilities and funding accrued rights.
For those of us who have followed Nigeria’s pension reform journey, the achievement is significant. Yet its real value must be judged by what retirees experience. Faster approval is worthwhile only if it leads to timely payment, fewer administrative obstacles and greater certainty of income after employment ends. The question is whether retirement can become a predictable transition to financial security rather than a period of anxiety and hardship.
PenCom’s Zero Waiting Time initiative for eligible Federal Government retirees points in this direction. The reported ₦758 billion Federal Government pension intervention to address historical liabilities, together with advance funding of accrued pension rights up to 2029, also illustrates the importance of meeting funding obligations ahead of retirement. These gains will endure only if institutions prevent new arrears from accumulating. The long-term objective should be to complete most verification and funding arrangements before retirement, leaving only essential final steps afterward.
Nigeria’s pension history has been marked by inadequate funding, accumulated liabilities, poor records and prolonged delays in accessing benefits. These weaknesses helped prompt the Pension Reform Act 2004, subsequently replaced by the Pension Reform Act 2014. The CPS requires contributions into individual Retirement Savings Accounts (RSAs), managed by licensed PFAs, with assets held by Pension Fund Custodians (PFCs) under PenCom’s supervision. This separation of administration and custody was intended to improve transparency, sustainability and protection of pension assets.
ALSO READ: We Are Still In Egypt, Mr President; By Iduh Onah
However, a funded system does not automatically guarantee access when benefits fall due. Unremitted contributions, unfunded accrued rights, incomplete employment records and cumbersome procedures can still leave workers without income at retirement. A retiree may lose a salary overnight while obligations for food, housing, healthcare and dependants continue. Delays therefore have immediate human consequences: debt, dependence and diminished dignity. Timely payment is not an administrative courtesy; it is central to the purpose of pension reform.
The foundation for the new arrangement was PenCom’s March 2025 circular on the approval and payment of benefits by PFAs, implemented from 1 June 2025. Previously, some categories of benefit applications required PenCom’s prior approval or a letter of no objection before payment could proceed. Although intended as a safeguard, that requirement added another processing stage.
Under the revised framework, prior Commission approval is no longer required for specified categories. PFAs assume greater responsibility for processing and approving eligible applications with complete documentation within two working days, while PFCs execute authorised payment instructions within the applicable regulatory timeline. This is a sensible decentralisation: the regulator need not approve every routine transaction if it can effectively supervise operators, monitor compliance and sanction failures.
But transferring authority also transfers responsibility. PFAs must demonstrate not only speed but accuracy, responsiveness and transparent communication with contributors and retirees. PenCom, in turn, must ensure that the mandatory timeline is enforceable in practice.
ALSO READ: A Formula For The Determination Of The National Minimum Wage; By Izielen Agbon
The reform’s most important qualification is the distinction between approving an application and paying the retiree. An approval notice cannot purchase food, settle rent or meet medical bills. A PFA may meet the two-working-day approval target while the beneficiary waits longer for funds to reach the designated account.
The clock may also start only when an application is deemed complete. If documentation disputes or missing records take weeks to resolve, headline approval figures could conceal the retiree’s actual waiting time. PenCom should therefore measure the full journey, from initial submission, through verification and approval, to receipt of payment and identify the causes of delays at each stage.
Funding backlogs must also be reported separately from routine application processing. References to historical waits of up to 21 months compared with 48-hour approvals should not suggest that distinct problems are identical. Clearing unfunded pension liabilities and speeding up approval of complete applications are both achievements, but each requires its own performance measure.
Retirement is ordinarily foreseeable. Employers usually know a worker’s birth date, service history and expected retirement date. Verification of contributions, personal records and eligibility should therefore begin well before the final day of work, allowing discrepancies to be resolved while the employee is still in service.
ALSO READ: Lagos–Calabar Coastal Highway: A Grand Illusion Or A Road To Nowhere? By Abadom Lawrence Amechi
PenCom’s Zero Waiting Time initiative for eligible Federal Government retirees points in this direction. The reported ₦758 billion Federal Government pension intervention to address historical liabilities, together with advance funding of accrued pension rights up to 2029, also illustrates the importance of meeting funding obligations ahead of retirement. These gains will endure only if institutions prevent new arrears from accumulating. The long-term objective should be to complete most verification and funding arrangements before retirement, leaving only essential final steps afterward.
PenCom deserves recognition for reducing unnecessary approval procedures and setting a more demanding standard for pension operators. The Commission must now consolidate the reform through effective supervision, transparent reporting and consistent enforcement. Employers must remit and fund obligations; PFAs must process claims fairly and promptly; custodians must execute authorised payments without unnecessary delay; and organised labour must continue defending retirees’ rights.
The 48-hour standard cannot compensate for employers’ failure to comply with the Pension Reform Act 2014. Where contributions are not remitted, amounts are incomplete or employment records are inaccurate, PFAs cannot simply approve away the resulting shortfall. PenCom’s recovery of outstanding contributions from defaulting employers is consequently as important as faster benefit processing.
ALSO READ: Insecurity: Government Should Trust Nigerians; By Owei Lakemfa
Enforcement and applicable sanctions must be sustained. Public-sector employers at federal, state and local levels must likewise fund and discharge pension obligations promptly. Workers should not carry the financial consequences of failures over which they had no control.
Pension benefits are deferred earnings and statutory entitlements, not acts of charity. Article 9 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recognises the right to social security. In Nigeria, Section 16(2)(d) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, identifies suitable and adequate pensions and old-age care among the state’s social objectives. Although this constitutional provision is generally not independently enforceable as a fundamental right, it expresses an important national commitment.
The Pension Reform Act 2014 gives specific legal effect to pension rights and responsibilities within its scope. Requiring retirees to make repeated visits to pension offices, rely on personal connections or endure avoidable hardship undermines the dignity and security the system is meant to protect. The reform should thus be understood as part of the wider pursuit of labour rights and social justice, not merely an exercise in administrative efficiency.
PenCom should require PFAs to publish clear application requirements, notify beneficiaries promptly of missing documents and provide accessible channels for tracking applications and resolving disputes. A delay should come with an explanation and a defined route for redress.
ALSO READ: Rule Of Law, Nigeria’s Only Hope Of Survival (2), By Hassan Gimba
Periodic performance reports should show the proportion of applications approved within two working days, the number and causes of exceptions, the time spent resolving documentation problems and, critically, the interval between approval and actual payment.
Reporting should distinguish operator-related delays from unpaid contributions and unfunded accrued rights. Independent verification, supervisory follow-up and proportionate sanctions would give the service standard credibility and help retirees compare the quality of service across operators.
Trade unions must help workers prepare for retirement by promoting pension literacy and early verification of RSA statements, contributions and personal records. They should work with employers and pension operators to institutionalise pre-retirement checks, pursue redress for unjustified delays and maintain constructive engagement with PenCom on implementation.
The duty of organised labour to defend workers’ interests does not end when active service ends. Securing prompt payment of lawful retirement benefits is an essential part of its commitment to social protection.
PenCom deserves recognition for reducing unnecessary approval procedures and setting a more demanding standard for pension operators. The Commission must now consolidate the reform through effective supervision, transparent reporting and consistent enforcement. Employers must remit and fund obligations; PFAs must process claims fairly and promptly; custodians must execute authorised payments without unnecessary delay; and organised labour must continue defending retirees’ rights.
Ultimately, the test is not whether a file is approved within 48 hours. It is whether a worker who has served for decades can retire with confidence that earned benefits will arrive promptly, provide dependable income and preserve personal dignity. Nigeria must move beyond celebrating faster approvals to guaranteeing timely payments and meaningful retirement security. That is the promise against which this reform should be judged.
Comrade Takor is a lawyer, trade unionist and human rights advocate. He is a former National President of the Non-Academic Staff Union of Educational and Associated Institutions (NASU), former National Treasurer of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), and immediate past Vice Chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Epe Branch.
