A CIVIL society organisation, under the aegis of African Leadership Strategy & Transparency Development Initiative (ALSTDI), has petitioned President Bola Tinubu, calling for the suspension and investigation of the Director-General and Comptroller-General of the Nigeria Agricultural Quarantine Service (NAQS), Dr Vincent Isegbe.
In its petition dated June 15, 2026, and signed by its Executive Director, Comrade Nelson Ossaieze, and routed through Mr. Muri Okunola, Principal Private Secretary to the President, the group accused Dr Isegbe of manipulating and allegedly forging provisions of the NAQS Establishment Act to unlawfully extend his stay in office.
In the petition sighted by National Record, ALSTDI is alleging that Isegbe altered the law governing the agency on several occasions to create a basis for extending his tenure beyond what was originally intended.
ALSTDI’s allegation makes it the second time in under two months that a call for probe of Dr Isegbe is been made over serious allegations of forgery.
In April, a civil society organisation, the Mission for Peace and Development Initiative (MPDI), petitioned President Tinubu, the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), the National Assembly, and the Department of State Services (DSS), calling for Isegbe’s suspension and investigation over similar allegations.
Like MPDI, ALSTDI claims that the alleged alterations could allow Isegbe to remain in charge of the agency for a total of 14 years.
It also alleged that Isegbe manipulated sections of the law relating to the appointment and tenure of the Director-General and then used the altered provisions to influence government officials, including the Minister of Agriculture and Food Security, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), and the Chief of Staff to the President. ALSTDI claims this ultimately led to his reappointment.
According to the petition, Isegbe has been in a leadership position within the agency since 2014, when he served as Coordinating Director, and later became Director-General in 2018. The group noted that he reportedly reached the mandatory retirement age of 60 in March 2021 but has continued to occupy leadership positions within the agency.
ALSTDI argued that the original executive bill establishing NAQS provided for a single five-year tenure for the Director-General. The group claimed that after the bill was passed by the National Assembly, provisions were allegedly inserted to allow for a second five-year term.
The organisation further alleged that these changes were made after the legislative process had been completed and before the bill received presidential assent. It suggested that signatures and official endorsements on some versions of the law should be investigated to determine their authenticity.
The group traced the history of the legislation, stating that the original bill to establish NAQS was first passed in 2010 but was not signed into law before the end of the administration in office at the time. It said the bill was later reconsidered by the National Assembly and passed again before eventually receiving presidential assent.
According to ALSTDI, the original version of the bill clearly stated that the Director-General would serve a single term of five years. The group argued that this was consistent with public service regulations, which place limits on the tenure of heads of government agencies.
The petition also claimed that different versions of the NAQS law were published on the agency’s website over the years. ALSTDI said these versions contained varying provisions regarding the tenure and qualifications of the Director-General.
The first version, according to the group, was published as the NAQS Act 2017 and lacked key endorsement and certification pages. The second version, described as the NAQS Act 2018, allegedly introduced a provision allowing the Director-General to serve two five-year terms. The group argued that this version also lacked proper certification.
ALSTDI further alleged that a third version appeared on the agency’s website in 2025. It claimed that the document contained suspicious signatures and formatting differences when compared with other laws signed around the same period.
A major concern raised by the organisation relates to provisions requiring that the Director-General be a serving officer within the agency.
According to ALSTDI , earlier versions of the legislation included this requirement, but it was allegedly removed in later versions to facilitate Isegbe’s continued stay in office after retirement.
The group stated that Isegbe completed his initial five-year tenure as Director-General on December 13, 2023, and subsequently handed over to the most senior officer in the agency, Dr Audu Godwin Sunday, in an acting capacity.
However, ALSTDI said that in March 2024, Isegbe returned to office with a letter from the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation indicating that he had been reappointed for another five-year term, effective from December 13, 2023.
The organisation argued that the reappointment was unlawful because it allegedly violated both the provisions of the agency’s enabling law and the Public Service Rules. According to the group, federal public service regulations limit the tenure of heads of government agencies and do not permit service beyond prescribed retirement conditions.
ALSTDI further claimed that concerned staff members had previously protested and submitted petitions regarding the matter. It alleged that the confusion surrounding the different versions of the NAQS law has undermined the credibility of the agency’s legal framework.
The organisation urged the ICPC, the Presidency, the DSS, the National Assembly, the Attorney-General of the Federation, the Nigeria Police Force, and the Ministry of Agriculture to investigate the allegations and determine whether any laws were violated.
The group maintained that Isegbe’s reappointment should be reviewed and, if found to be inconsistent with the law, reversed in the public interest.
Efforts to obtain a response from NAQS through its Corporate Communications Department were unsuccessful as at the time of going to press.
